At CFDA Town Hall Meeting, Future of Fashion Week Contemplated

Tue, 07/28/09 — 05:36:03 PM

>> This morning, the CFDA held its first town hall meeting, moderated by CFDA president Diane von Furstenberg, to discuss whether Fashion Week is still relevant.  Many attendees agreed with Proenza Schouler's Jack McCollough, who voiced his concern: "There seems to be a disconnect. For us, the shows have become a press thing. It’s on blogs; magazines pull straight from the runways; and by the time it’s in stores, it feels sort of old."

Donna Karan, who has long been a proponent of selling and showing clothes in season, also wondered about the timeliness of the shows: "We are in a crisis. There's no question about it . . . We spend so much money on shows, but what is it getting us?”

In reply, Diane von Furstenberg pointed out, "People want shows. The photos travel. So . . . I don’t know.” But she remains optimistic: "There is no way when you are in the middle of a tsunami that you can change absolutely everything. But one thing that we can do and that I would like to do is make New York Fashion Week the most dynamic fashion week in the world."  She hopes that a solution can be found and organized by September 2010. “Maybe there can be a Fashion Week that says trade and another one that says shop?” 

While some were considering the possibility of fashion shows for consumers, Anna Wintour piped up, concerned with the premature discounting that has been happening at the retailer level: “Could someone lead a committee that would make ground rules for retailers of when the discounting starts, and then all the retailers can agree to it?” Von Furstenberg informed her that that would be illegal, but Wintour was not deterred: “Is that something we can change? We have friends in the White House now!” Finally, DVF considered the suggestion: “Anything is possible.”

posted by
Wed, 07/29/2009 - 7:17am

No Anna, the Whitehouse won't change that law. What you are talking about is COLLUSION, and it is a huge No-No in American Law, dating back to anti-trust legislation.

Violations of this law include treble damages (basically 3 times what you made by violating the law) and those damages are calculated by a highly trained, extremely nasty group of forensic accountants from the Department of the Treasurey, the FBI, and the IRS.

As for Obama being a "friend" in the Whitehouse, I somehow think reversing decades of criminal law in order to protect a business run by millionaires and billionaires that sells goods to other millionaires and billionaires is not too high on his list of to-do. Especially since the fashion industry includes almost no manufacturing jobs in the U.S.

And since getting rid of collusion would benefit the Oil Industry more than any other industry in America, by letting them actually, and openly, set the price of gas and oil amongst themselves, I doubt it will come to happen.

I didn't realize AW was this stupid.


Post New Comment

If you are already an OnSugar member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are made, please login or register for OnSugar. Or connect with your Facebook account: .
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

About this site

fashionologie is the musings of a twenty-something American girl who wishes she could have a Freaky Friday incident and switch bodies with Phoebe Philo.

Ad - 300 x 250

Archive

November 2009
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930 

Ad - Sky